Telecommunications Infrastructure & Network Services, Plano TX Field-Services Firm

$7.8M

Revenue

$1.2M

SDE

10.4x

Multiple

Subscribe Free

Read the full deal writeup

Get Free Access

Already a member? Sign in

Full Editorial Writeup

This is a telecommunications infrastructure and network-services firm based in Plano, Texas, founded in 2016. It performs mission-critical network deployment, field installation, maintenance, and related infrastructure work for commercial, carrier, utility, and enterprise clients. The work is tied to the ongoing buildout of fiber, broadband, wireless, and enterprise connectivity, and the business claims direct master service agreements with major telecom and technology organizations.

The company runs on a blend of 30 full-time employees and 30 contractors, a structure that keeps fixed labor cost flexible against project volume. On $7.8M of revenue it produces $1.2M of stated cash flow, roughly a 15% owner-earnings margin, which is healthy for a field-services contractor but leaves the 10.42x asking multiple looking rich for a business of this size and profile.

The listing is deliberately a teaser: no customer names, no contract terms, no customer concentration, no tax returns. That is standard for a confidential telecom-services sale, but it means the entire investment case (recurring maintenance mix, MSA durability, single-customer dependence) sits behind the NDA. Management projects 2026 gross income above $10M, which if real would reset the effective multiple materially lower, but that number is forward-looking and unverified.

Why we like it

Earnings quality is anchored to recurring maintenance and MSA-based field work rather than one-off project revenue, which is the more durable slice of telecom services. At $1.2M cash flow on $7.8M revenue the margin is solid for a contractor, though the contractor-heavy labor model makes those margins depend on utilization holding up.
The moat, if it exists, lives in the direct master service agreements with major carriers and technology organizations. These relationships are hard to originate and create a defensible pipeline position, but the listing withholds every detail that would let you gauge how sticky and concentrated they actually are.
The macro tailwind is real and multi-year: fiber deployment, rural broadband subsidies, wireless densification, and enterprise network modernization are all funded, secular spending cycles. A field-services platform positioned against that demand should see steady work regardless of the broader economy.
This is a clean roll-up or add-on candidate for a strategic or PE buyer. The field-services market is fragmented, the seller is only semi-retiring, and the platform already has procurement access and operational infrastructure to bolt on adjacent geographies or service lines.

How to improve it

Convert as much project-based work as possible into standing recurring maintenance and managed-service contracts. Every MSA that shifts from ad hoc dispatch to a fixed monthly retainer raises earnings quality and the exit multiple, and it smooths the revenue lumpiness inherent in deployment work.
Rebalance the 50/50 employee-to-contractor mix deliberately based on margin data. Contractors give flexibility on variable project volume, but bringing repeatable, high-utilization scopes in-house can capture margin currently leaking to subs, provided you protect against fixed-cost drag in slow quarters.
Diversify the customer base to reduce dependence on a handful of carrier MSAs. Pursue utility, government, and enterprise connectivity relationships in parallel so a single carrier repricing or reallocating spend cannot cut earnings in half.
Build a disciplined bidding and estimating function to win larger carrier, enterprise, and government projects the listing says are accessible. Standardized bid processes and job-cost tracking turn pipeline access into consistently profitable backlog rather than one-off wins.
Execute the geographic expansion thesis by cloning the field-services model into adjacent metros where the same carriers already deploy. Follow existing customer relationships into new markets rather than building demand from scratch, which is lower-risk expansion capital.
Instrument the business with proper job-level and margin reporting before scaling. A contractor at this size often runs on gut feel, and installing project P&L, change-order tracking, and utilization dashboards protects margins as headcount and geography grow.
Use the platform as a consolidation vehicle and pursue add-on acquisitions of smaller local field-services firms. Buying regional competitors at lower multiples than the 10.42x you would pay here is the fastest way to arbitrage the entry price back down.

Diligence notes

The 10.42x multiple on $1.2M cash flow is aggressive for a nine-year-old field-services contractor, so the entire case rests on the unverified 2026 projection of $10M+ gross income and improving margins. Demand the trailing and interim financials, tax returns, and monthly revenue trend to confirm whether growth is real and durable or a forecast used to justify price.
Customer concentration is the single biggest unknown and is explicitly hidden behind the NDA. Get the revenue split by customer for the last three years, confirm how much sits with the top one or two carriers, and read the actual MSA terms including termination-for-convenience clauses and volume commitments.
The labor model of 30 employees plus 30 contractors needs scrutiny for classification risk and margin stability. Verify contractor agreements, confirm they would not be reclassified as employees, and understand how much of the workforce is tied to specific customers or projects that could walk post-close.
Separate the recurring maintenance revenue from lumpy deployment and installation project revenue. The listing implies both, but the durability and multiple justification depend heavily on how much is genuinely repeatable versus project backlog that must be re-won each cycle.
Confirm the reason for sale and the seller's post-close role. The stated reason is semi-retirement, but a founder-led services firm with key carrier relationships often has personal goodwill embedded in those contracts, so quantify transition risk and negotiate an earnout or transition period tied to MSA retention.
Validate the $510,000 FF&E and the working capital and equipment needed to service the backlog. Field-services firms carry receivables, retainage, and equipment cycles, so model the true cash conversion and whether additional working capital is required day one to fund payroll ahead of customer payment.

Source

Originally listed on BizBuySell. View original listing →