Published SEP 19, 2026

Specialty Fire, Water & Mold Restoration Co, Minnesota

Minnesota

$2.1M
Revenue
$578K
SDE
1.9x
Multiple
Subscribe Free

Read the full deal writeup

Sign up for a free Accredited account to read the editorial writeup, financials, and broker contact for this deal.

Get Free Access

Already a member? Sign in

Full Editorial Writeup

This is a Minnesota-based specialty restoration business serving residential and commercial clients statewide after fire, water, smoke, and mold damage. What separates it from a generic demo-and-replace restoration outfit is its focus on content restoration: professionally cleaning and salvaging what a disaster touched using IICRC-certified techniques, climate-controlled on-site storage, and a documented, insurance-friendly claims process. For a family that just lost a home, recovering irreplaceable belongings is emotionally loaded work, which builds unusually strong loyalty and referral pull.

The engine here is relationships, not marketing spend. Insurance adjusters, agents, and general restoration contractors funnel claims to the company because they need a trusted specialist to handle the content-recovery side of a loss. That referral network is the source of what the listing frames as recurring revenue, and it is the reason FY2025 delivered some of the strongest growth in company history.

That growth was deliberate and compounding: ownership renegotiated better economics with its largest referral partner while capturing a bigger share of that partner's volume, and simultaneously added five new referral partners to diversify the top of the funnel. At $2.06M revenue and $577,634 in cash flow, the business is being offered at $1.1M, roughly 1.9x SDE, with 13 employees including 2 managers and modest seller financing on the table.

Why we like it

  • Earnings quality is strong for the price: $577,634 of cash flow on $2.06M revenue is a 28% owner-earnings margin, and the 1.9x multiple is cheap for a service business with insurance-driven demand. With only $38,938 of FF&E and a leased facility, the buyer is paying almost entirely for cash flow and referral relationships rather than depreciating hardware.
  • The moat is the referral network. Adjusters, agents, and general contractors send work to a specialist they trust, and switching that trust is slow and relationship-dependent. FY2025 proved the model is reinforceable: renegotiated economics with the top partner plus five new partners added, which both grew the top line and diversified concentration risk.
  • Demand is non-discretionary and event-driven. Fires, floods, and mold do not pause in a recession, and the insurer pays the invoice rather than a cash-strapped homeowner. That insulates revenue from consumer confidence and makes the cash flow unusually durable versus most home-services comps.
  • There is a real operator advantage in a manager-supported structure. With 2 managers already in place across 13 employees, a buyer can step into an existing chain of command rather than being the sole point of failure. The demonstrated FY2025 playbook of expanding referral partners is repeatable by a hands-on owner who wants to press growth.

How to improve it

  • Audit and formalize the referral partner agreements in the first 90 days. The renegotiated deal with the largest partner is the growth story, so lock in written terms, understand the concentration exposure, and identify which of the five new partners are ramping. Codify the outreach playbook so partner acquisition becomes a system, not a founder skill.
  • Build a repeatable business-development motion targeting insurance carriers and independent adjusters directly. The current funnel relies on relationships that may live in the seller's head, so hire or assign a dedicated BD person to institutionalize those introductions. Every new adjuster relationship compounds because each one sends recurring claim volume.
  • Tighten job-level margin reporting by loss type (fire vs water vs mold vs contents). Understanding which categories carry the best economics lets you steer capacity and pricing toward the highest-margin work. This also arms you to renegotiate fee arrangements with other partners the way ownership did with the largest one.
  • Evaluate the 27,700 SF leased facility at $20,842 per month against actual storage and operational utilization. That is roughly $250k of annual rent, a meaningful fixed cost, so confirm the climate-controlled storage capacity is being monetized. If underused, sublease or renegotiate; if constrained, it may be a growth bottleneck worth solving.
  • Add 24/7 emergency intake and rapid-response dispatch if not already in place. Restoration is a speed business where the first responder to a loss often wins the contents job. A dedicated after-hours line and guaranteed response window would let you capture more of each partner's referral volume.
  • Cross-train and deepen the management bench beyond the current 2 managers. With only a 2-week seller handover, key-person risk sits with whoever holds the technical IICRC expertise and partner relationships. Documenting SOPs and certifying additional leads de-risks the operation and supports scaling.
  • Expand geographically into adjacent Minnesota markets using the proven partner model. The business already serves clients statewide, so the constraint is capacity and local relationships, not demand. Layering in new metro adjuster networks is the clearest path to the next revenue tier.

Diligence notes

  • Scrutinize referral partner concentration. FY2025 growth leaned heavily on renegotiating and expanding volume with the single largest partner, so quantify what percentage of revenue that one source represents. If losing it would gut the business, the 1.9x multiple needs to reflect that fragility.
  • Validate the FY2025 growth is durable and not a one-year spike from favorable weather or a large loss event. The listing insists it was deliberate rather than event-driven, so pull multi-year revenue and job-count trends to confirm a real upward trajectory. Contents restoration volume can be lumpy year to year.
  • Confirm the recurring-revenue characterization. This is referral-driven repeat work, not contracted subscription revenue, so understand whether the flow is genuinely sticky or dependent on relationships that could follow the seller out the door. Ask directly who owns each key partner relationship.
  • Review insurance-billing dynamics and receivables aging. Insurer-paid work can mean slow payment cycles and disputed claims, so examine days-sales-outstanding and any history of denied or reduced payouts. Working capital needs could be higher than the clean margin implies.
  • Assess the leased-building lease terms, remaining runway, and transferability. At over $250k annually, the facility is a major fixed cost, so confirm the lease term, renewal options, and whether the rate is at market. A short remaining term or a landlord relationship tied to the seller is a real risk.
  • Understand the true owner workload given the 'pursue other interests' reason for sale and only a 2-week handover. Two weeks is thin for a relationship-driven business, so map exactly what the owner does day to day and whether the 2 managers can absorb it. Negotiate for a longer transition or an earn-out to protect against relationship attrition.

Source

Originally listed on BizBuySell. View original listing →

Want the full analysis on every deal? Unlock the complete platform with Accredited Pro to screen live listings and read our operator-level writeups.