Pensacola Construction Materials Manufacturer, Land and Inventory Included

$3.0M

Revenue

$1.2M

SDE

7.8x

Multiple

Subscribe Free

Read the full deal writeup

Get Free Access

Already a member? Sign in

Full Editorial Writeup

This is a Pensacola-based manufacturer and direct seller of construction materials, positioned by the listing as the largest player in its niche within the local market. The company both produces and sells directly to contractors and construction companies, which is where the stated margins come from: cutting out the middleman means capturing the full spread between raw input and finished product. On roughly $3.0M in revenue it throws off $1.16M in cash flow, a 39 percent margin that is unusually strong for a manufacturing operation and consistent with a vertically integrated producer-seller model.

The headline of this deal is not the operating business, it is the balance sheet. The asking price of $9.0M includes $2.6M of owned land, $1.0M of FF&E, and a formally appraised $40M-plus (listed elsewhere as $51M) of unprocessed raw inventory sitting on that land. The pitch is essentially that a buyer inherits years of feedstock already on the ground, so the operation can keep converting inventory into salable material without meaningful new procurement for an extended period.

The operation runs lean with 11 full-time employees and a decades-long track record as the local go-to supplier. The seller is exiting to retire. A buyer needs to underwrite two very different things here: the durable cash-flow engine, and the enormous, illiquid inventory asset whose real value depends entirely on the appraisal method, extraction cost, and how quickly it actually converts to cash.

Why we like it

The earnings quality looks strong on paper: $1.16M of cash flow on $3.0M of revenue is a 39 percent margin, driven by vertical integration where the company both produces and sells directly to end users. That producer-to-contractor structure eliminates distributor spread and explains the outsized profitability relative to a typical building-materials reseller.
Construction materials are genuinely non-discretionary within their category. Contractors need aggregate, stone, or similar inputs to complete projects regardless of the economic cycle, and being the largest local supplier with a decades-long reputation makes this the default vendor for regional builders. That incumbency is a real moat in a business where reliability and proximity beat price shopping.
The land is owned and included in the asking price, which means the buyer controls the site rather than facing landlord risk or lease renewals. For a materials operation tied to a physical extraction or processing site, owning the ground is the difference between a durable asset and a business that can be evicted from its own supply.
The inventory position is the wild card that could be a real edge: if the appraised unprocessed inventory is anywhere near the claimed value, a buyer inherits years of feedstock and can run the plant without near-term procurement spend. That would insulate the operation from input-cost inflation and supply disruptions that hammer competitors.

How to improve it

Independently re-appraise the unprocessed inventory with a third party who values extraction and processing cost, not just gross tonnage. The entire deal thesis hinges on whether $40M-plus of raw material is real, recoverable, and salable, so nail down net realizable value before agreeing to any price built around it.
Rationalize the asking price against the operating business alone. At $1.16M cash flow, the operations are worth roughly $3.5M to $4.5M at normal manufacturing multiples, so structure the offer so you are not paying a premium for illiquid inventory you cannot quickly monetize.
Build a formal sales and account-management function to widen the contractor base beyond the current concentration. An 11-person shop that is the local giant almost certainly leaves regional expansion and new-account acquisition on the table with even light commercial effort.
Analyze pricing power given the dominant local position. If this is the go-to supplier with decades of incumbency, there is likely room for measured price increases on standard SKUs that flow almost entirely to the bottom line given the margin structure.
Document and systematize the production process before the seller leaves. With only 11 employees and a retiring owner, key operational knowledge is probably concentrated in a few heads, so lock down SOPs and cross-training during the transition window.
Explore adjacent products the existing site and equipment can produce. If the raw inventory and $1M of FF&E can be redirected into additional material lines, incremental revenue can be captured with minimal added fixed cost.
Evaluate financing the land separately via an SBA 504 or mortgage to reduce upfront cash. The $2.6M of owned real estate can be leveraged to lower the equity check and improve cash-on-cash return.

Diligence notes

Verify the inventory appraisal in exhaustive detail. The listing cites both $40M-plus and $51M for unprocessed inventory, an inconsistency that demands explanation, and you need to understand the appraisal methodology, extraction and processing cost per unit, and how many years of sales this actually represents at current volume.
Confirm the revenue and cash flow with three years of tax returns and bank statements. A 39 percent cash-flow margin is high for manufacturing, so trace the SDE add-backs and make sure owner compensation, one-time items, and inventory accounting are not inflating the reported number.
Investigate any permitting, zoning, or environmental exposure tied to materials extraction or processing on the owned land. Mining, quarrying, or aggregate processing sites carry reclamation obligations and regulatory risk that can create major hidden liabilities.
Assess customer concentration among the contractor base. If a handful of local construction firms drive most revenue, a downturn or the loss of one relationship could materially dent the cash flow that justifies the price.
Clarify the actual years in business, which the listing lists as Not Disclosed despite claiming a decades-long history. Confirm the operating history, the reason no establishment date is stated, and whether the entity has changed hands or structure over time.

Source

Originally listed on BizBuySell. View original listing →