Executive Advisory & Management Consulting Firm, Remote National Practice

$615K

Revenue

$935K

SDE

2.3x

Multiple

Subscribe Free

Read the full deal writeup

Get Free Access

Already a member? Sign in

Full Editorial Writeup

This is a remote-first management consulting practice that advises C-suite leaders and senior executive teams at mid-to-large enterprises, typically companies doing $500 million to $10 billion in annual revenue. The work spans three interconnected lanes: corporate strategy development and execution, organizational design and restructuring, and leadership effectiveness. Clients come from manufacturing, financial services, technology, media, and communications, concentrated across Midwest and East Coast markets.

The economics are the headline. On roughly $615k of gross revenue the firm throws off $935k in reported cash flow (SDE), which is a mathematical impossibility on its face and the single biggest thing a buyer must reconcile before doing anything else. The listing elsewhere references revenue approaching $1 million and adjusted cash flow exceeding $610k, so the numbers in the fields do not agree with the narrative. What is clear is that this is a lean, IP-driven professional services model built on proprietary frameworks connecting strategic planning, organizational performance, and leadership behavior, delivered by one full-time owner plus four contractors.

Revenue is generated across initial strategy engagements, recurring accountability and execution support, org redesign projects, and leadership coaching. Client acquisition runs on referrals and targeted business development, with relationships that extend across multiple years and successive engagements. The value here is real but it is also intensely personal: this is largely one senior operator's reputation, relationships, and judgment, dressed up as a transferable platform.

Why we like it

The margin profile, if it survives diligence, is exceptional for a services business, with the narrative citing 60%+ cash flow margins and multi-year client relationships that produce repeat and expansion revenue. Recurring accountability and execution support engagements suggest at least some annuity-like revenue rather than pure one-and-done project work.
The moat is the proprietary IP: an integrated suite of strategy, org performance, and leadership frameworks that anchor every engagement. If those methodologies can genuinely be documented and taught, they convert founder knowledge into a transferable asset, which is exactly what separates a sellable consulting firm from a job.
The delivery model is capital-light and scalable, running with one full-time person and a flexible bench of experienced outside consultants. That structure lets a buyer expand engagement volume without adding fixed overhead, and it means there is very little to break operationally.
The seller is offering an unusually long 2 to 3 year handoff including direct client introductions, co-delivery on live engagements, and help productizing the IP into training or content. For a relationship-driven advisory practice, that length of transition is the difference between buying a business and buying a rolodex that walks out the door.
Blue-chip client size ($500M to $10B enterprises) means engagement values and switching inertia are high, and a strategic buyer with an existing client network could cross-sell these frameworks from day one. The end market is fragmented and referral-driven, which favors an acquirer who can institutionalize business development.

How to improve it

Reconcile the financials before anything else, then rebuild reporting so revenue, cost of contractor delivery, and true owner-adjusted cash flow are unambiguous. The gap between $615k revenue and $935k cash flow has to be explained by add-backs or a data error, and the answer determines whether this is a $2.1M business or a $600k one.
Convert the proprietary IP into a codified, documented methodology with playbooks, templates, and a training curriculum in the first 90 days. This is the lever that de-risks founder dependence and creates the standalone asset value the listing claims exists.
Build a repeatable business development engine beyond the owner's personal referrals, including a targeted outbound motion, thought-leadership content, and a defined account expansion process. Right now demand generation is tied to one person's network, which is the biggest single point of failure.
Systematize the contractor bench into a managed delivery model with clear roles, quality standards, and utilization tracking so engagements can be staffed without the owner personally delivering. This turns the firm from owner-led to team-delivered and is prerequisite to any growth.
Push harder on the recurring accountability and execution support line, packaging it as a retainer or subscription tier layered on top of project work. Predictable monthly revenue would materially rerate the multiple and smooth the cash flow.
Segment the client base by industry vertical and productize a version of the framework per sector, allowing faster onboarding and premium pricing. Specialization deepens the moat and shortens sales cycles.
Formalize a partner or acquirer cross-sell motion if bought by a firm with an existing client base, mapping the frameworks against that buyer's relationships. The listing explicitly flags day-one cross-sell as a value source, so quantify it in the deal model.

Diligence notes

Reconcile the impossible-looking numbers immediately: $935k cash flow on $615k revenue cannot both be true as stated. Get three years of tax returns and P&Ls, understand every add-back, and determine which figure (the field revenue or the narrative's approaching $1M) reflects reality.
Quantify founder dependence hard. Establish what share of revenue is personally originated and personally delivered by the owner, how many clients would follow the frameworks versus the person, and whether the 2 to 3 year transition is genuinely enough to retain them.
Audit revenue concentration and recurrence by client and engagement type. Determine how much is truly recurring accountability revenue versus episodic project work, and how many clients account for the majority of billings, since a couple of enterprise relationships walking away could halve the business.
Validate the proprietary IP claim: confirm it is documented, legally owned by the entity (not the individual), and actually transferable rather than living in the owner's head. Ownership of the frameworks is the entire thesis for standalone value.
Scrutinize the contractor network. Confirm whether the four contractors are exclusive, replaceable, or client-relationship holders themselves, and whether any could leave and compete or take clients with them post-close.
At a 2.27x multiple the price looks cheap for a 60% margin firm, which usually signals either transferability risk or a numbers problem. Pressure-test why a business this profitable is priced this low and whether the discount reflects the founder-dependence and financial-clarity issues above.

Source

Originally listed on BizBuySell. View original listing →