Memory Care & Assisted Living Communities, Six-Location Western US Operator

$33.0M

Revenue

$1.3M

SDE

Subscribe Free

Read the full deal writeup

Get Free Access

Already a member? Sign in

Full Editorial Writeup

This is a six-community senior living operator based in the Western US, delivering independent living, assisted living, and memory care under one management platform. The company has over 30 years of operating history and an executive team with a combined 95-plus years in healthcare, which matters in a business where regulatory compliance and clinical execution are the difference between a smooth acquisition and a liability minefield. Across the six communities it runs 271,922 square feet of resident space, all leased from unrelated third parties under long-term, assumable leases.

The demand story here is straightforward and durable. Memory care and assisted living serve a population that is aging regardless of the economy, and the need for 24/7 care does not disappear in a downturn. Occupancy sits at 91.8% as of April 2026, which is a strong number for this asset class and signals the communities are well-run and reputationally solid in their local markets.

On $32.98M of revenue the business reports $1.26M of EBITDA, a roughly 3.8% margin. That is thin for senior living and is the single most important thing a buyer needs to understand: this is a scaled but low-margin operation where labor, occupancy, and rate management drive everything. The upside case is margin expansion through operating discipline plus the disclosed growth paths of geographic expansion into Texas, Arizona, and Nevada and adding at-home care services.

Why we like it

Earnings quality is anchored by recurring monthly resident fees across six communities at 91.8% occupancy, which produces predictable, contracted cash flow that renews by default rather than requiring each sale to be re-won. Senior housing revenue is sticky because move-outs are costly and disruptive for families, so census tends to be stable once a resident is placed. The $32.98M top line at scale gives a buyer a real operating base to work with.
Durability and moat come from 30-plus years of operating history, an experienced clinical and executive team, and strategic locations near hospitals that create referral relationships and clinical credibility. Memory care in particular is a high-acuity, licensed niche with meaningful regulatory barriers to entry, which protects incumbents. Reputation and word of mouth in local markets are hard for new entrants to replicate quickly.
The market tailwind is demographic and non-cyclical: the aging Western US population and the rising prevalence of dementia drive structural demand for memory care that does not soften in a recession. Care needs are medical, not discretionary, so families continue to pay even when budgets tighten. This is exactly the kind of essential-service exposure that protects downside.
The operator advantage is clear: at a 3.8% EBITDA margin, this is an underperforming margin profile for the asset class, meaning modest improvements in rate, labor efficiency, and ancillary services can move EBITDA materially. A disciplined operator inherits scale, occupancy, and licenses, then works the P&L. The disclosed expansion runway into TX, AZ, and NV plus at-home services adds organic growth on top of margin repair.

How to improve it

Attack the margin gap first. A 3.8% EBITDA margin on $33M of revenue is well below where a competently run assisted living portfolio should sit, so audit labor cost per resident, agency/temp nursing usage, and management overhead in the first 90 days to find the leakage. Even 200 to 300 basis points of margin recovery would meaningfully change the enterprise value.
Push rate and unit mix toward higher-acuity memory care. Memory care commands premium pricing over standard assisted living, so review the current bed mix and pricing schedule against local market comps to identify underpriced units. Repricing and shifting mix toward memory care lifts revenue per occupied bed without adding real estate.
Build a structured referral engine with the nearby hospitals and discharge planners. The communities are already located near hospitals, but formalizing relationships with case managers, home health agencies, and physician groups turns proximity into a consistent lead pipeline. This defends occupancy and reduces reliance on marketing spend.
Launch the disclosed at-home care service line as a feeder into the communities. In-home services create a new revenue stream and a natural conversion path when a client's needs escalate to a higher care level. It also deepens the relationship with families before they choose a facility, improving lifetime value per household.
Underwrite and de-risk the assumable long-term leases before growth. Because all six communities and the office are leased from third parties, model rent escalators, renewal terms, and remaining tenure carefully, since lease economics dictate the margin ceiling. Renegotiating or extending favorable leases protects the acquisition thesis.
Standardize operations and reporting across the six communities. With multiple legal entities and a soon-departing ownership group, install unified financial reporting, occupancy dashboards, and clinical KPIs so the platform runs on systems rather than founder knowledge. This is essential before pursuing the TX, AZ, and NV expansion.

Diligence notes

Scrutinize the low EBITDA margin to determine whether it reflects fixable operating inefficiency or structural cost pressure. Break out labor, agency nursing, insurance, and rent as a percent of revenue at each community, because if margins are compressed by non-discretionary items like lease rates and mandated staffing ratios, the upside case weakens considerably.
Review every long-term lease in detail, including remaining term, escalators, renewal options, and assumability conditions. Since the operator owns no real estate and leases all six communities plus the office (month-to-month), the leases ARE the business, and any unfavorable renewal or landlord concentration is a direct risk to durability of cash flow.
Verify occupancy quality and payer mix behind the 91.8% figure. Confirm whether census is private-pay, Medicaid, or mixed, since payer mix drives both revenue per resident and reimbursement risk, and a heavy Medicaid tilt would explain the thin margin and cap pricing power.
Examine regulatory, licensing, and clinical compliance history across all six licensed communities. Pull state survey results, deficiency citations, incident reports, and any pending litigation, because memory care is high-acuity and a single serious compliance failure can trigger fines, admissions holds, or license loss that impairs the whole portfolio.
Untangle the multi-entity ownership and management structure. With numerous legal entities owned by four shareholders and three preparing to exit, map exactly which entities, contracts, and licenses transfer, and quantify key-person risk given only one shareholder would consider staying and 95 years of institutional knowledge may walk out the door.

Source

Originally listed on BizBuySell. View original listing →