Published SEP 15, 2026

Entertainment & IP Advisory Firm, 30-Year Virtual Practice

$1.7M
Revenue
$1.1M
SDE
4.5x
Multiple
Subscribe Free

Read the full deal writeup

Sign up for a free Accredited account to read the editorial writeup, financials, and broker contact for this deal.

Get Free Access

Already a member? Sign in

Full Editorial Writeup

This is a boutique professional services firm operating virtually, providing specialized financial analysis, auditing, valuation, and consulting to clients in the entertainment and intellectual property sectors. Core service lines include revenue and royalty analysis, asset valuation, and litigation support, all of which require deep domain expertise that is not easily replicated. Founded in 1992, the firm has carved out a defensible niche serving a diverse base of professional and industry clients over more than three decades.

The economics are the story here: on $1.7 million of revenue the business produces $1.123 million in cash flow, a roughly 66 percent owner-earnings margin. That kind of margin is only achievable in an asset-light, expertise-driven practice where the founder's reputation and specialized knowledge are the product. With just two full-time employees, this is a lean operation carrying almost no overhead beyond labor.

The flip side of that margin profile is concentration risk. A two-person firm generating seven figures of cash flow is almost certainly built on the founder's personal relationships, credibility, and possibly their standing as an expert witness in litigation matters. The seller is retiring and pricing the deal firmly at $5 million (4.45x cash flow), which for a services firm this dependent on the owner is aggressive unless the transition and client transfer are airtight.

Why we like it

  • Earnings quality is exceptional on paper: $1.123 million of cash flow on $1.7 million of revenue is a 66 percent margin, which reflects an asset-light practice with minimal overhead beyond two employees. Margins like this are the signature of high-value, low-cost-to-deliver expertise work rather than commoditized bookkeeping.
  • The moat is specialization. Royalty analysis, IP valuation, and entertainment litigation support are narrow, technical disciplines with few credible providers, and the firm has built that reputation since 1992. Clients in disputes and valuation matters do not price-shop, they hire the recognized expert.
  • The service is genuinely recession-resistant, and arguably counter-cyclical. Litigation support and royalty audits often increase when money gets tight and parties fight over revenue splits, so the demand does not evaporate in a downturn the way discretionary advisory work does.
  • For the right operator with entertainment finance or forensic accounting credentials, this is a clean bolt-on to an existing valuation or litigation practice. The virtual model means no geographic constraint and the two-person cost structure leaves obvious room to layer on additional professionals and capacity.

How to improve it

  • Document and systematize the founder's methodology within the first 90 days. Every royalty audit template, valuation model, and litigation workpaper needs to live in the firm, not the owner's head, so the practice survives the seller's exit and can be delegated to junior staff.
  • Move billing toward retainers and recurring engagements. Structure ongoing royalty examination and monitoring agreements with major clients so revenue recurs by default rather than being re-won on each project, which also raises the multiple on any future exit.
  • Hire and credential a successor professional immediately. The single biggest value driver post-close is transferring the expert reputation to a named individual who can appear in depositions and sign valuations, reducing key-person risk before it becomes a client-flight event.
  • Build a formal referral pipeline with entertainment attorneys and talent agencies. These are the gatekeepers who route litigation support and valuation work, and a structured relationship program converts ad hoc referrals into a predictable inbound channel.
  • Add capacity to take on more concurrent engagements. With only two full-time staff, the firm is almost certainly turning away or queuing work; adding one or two trained analysts could expand throughput without materially compressing the margin.
  • Cross-sell adjacent services into the existing client base. Clients who use royalty audits often need valuation, tax structuring, or expert testimony, and mapping the current book against unserved needs is the fastest organic revenue lift.
  • Formalize client contracts and pricing tiers. Standardizing engagement letters and rate cards de-risks the business for a lender or future buyer and gives the operator leverage to raise prices on a client base that hires on reputation, not cost.

Diligence notes

  • Quantify key-person dependency ruthlessly. Determine how much of the $1.123 million cash flow is tied to the founder personally as an expert witness or named signatory, and what happens to those engagements when they leave. This single factor determines whether $5 million is a fair price or a trap.
  • Examine client concentration and revenue durability. With only $1.7 million in revenue, a handful of large clients could represent the majority of the book, and litigation support is inherently lumpy and project-based rather than contracted. Request three to five years of revenue by client to test stability.
  • Verify the earnings and understand the reason net differs from cash flow. The listing cites $1.123 million cash flow and separately a $1.127 million net; confirm add-backs, owner compensation, and whether the SDE assumes the buyer replaces the founder's billable capacity for free, which it should not.
  • Scrutinize the transition terms, since none are disclosed. For a firm this dependent on one person's reputation, a multi-year earnout, extended seller consulting, and warm client and attorney introductions are essential, and the seller's firm-price posture may signal limited flexibility on deal structure.
  • Pressure-test the 4.45x multiple against services comps. Two-person expertise firms with this much owner dependence typically trade at 2.5x to 3.5x cash flow, so justify the premium with documented recurring revenue, transferable brand, or a credentialed successor already in place.

Source

Originally listed on BizBuySell. View original listing →

Want the full analysis on every deal? Unlock the complete platform with Accredited Pro to screen live listings and read our operator-level writeups.