Confidential Aerospace & Defense Manufacturer, AS9100D Certified ATE/ATS/TPS Systems, New York Metro

$7.5M

Revenue

$1.2M

SDE

7.1x

Multiple

Subscribe Free

Read the full deal writeup

Get Free Access Access Unlimited Deals

Already a member? Sign in

Full Editorial Writeup

This is a confidential aerospace and defense manufacturer based in the New York Metro Area, including Long Island, selling via a stock transaction. The company specializes in precision manufacturing and testing systems, specifically Automatic Test Equipment (ATE), Automatic Test Systems (ATS), and Test Program Sets (TPS), alongside complex components and subassemblies that feed U.S. defense programs, NATO supply chains, and tier-one primes. It carries AS9100D certification, sits on a GSA Schedule, and is registered with the U.S. Department of State, which are the credentials that let a shop like this bid and ship into the defense procurement machine.

The customer roster is the headline: long-standing relationships with Boeing, Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, BAE Systems, Teradyne, and Northrop Grumman. These are sticky, qualification-heavy accounts. Once you are an approved supplier on a defense program and your test equipment is designed into a platform, you tend to stay there for the life of the program because requalifying a new vendor is slow, expensive, and risky. That is the real moat here, not the machinery.

At $7.5M revenue and $1.2M SDE, this is a sub-scale but profitable specialty shop with roughly a 16 percent owner margin. The seller is explicitly restricting the buyer pool to qualified strategic buyers with aerospace and defense experience and is refusing absentee investors, which tells you the technical workforce and the owner's program knowledge are load-bearing. The $8.5M ask at 7.08x SDE is a strategic-buyer multiple, priced for the certifications and prime relationships rather than the cash flow alone.

Why we like it

Earnings quality is anchored to defense and NATO program work rather than discretionary demand, so the $1.2M SDE on $7.5M revenue is backed by budgets that do not vanish in a downturn. Government and prime contractor spending on test equipment and sustainment tends to be multi-year and program-locked, which smooths the revenue line relative to a commercial manufacturer.
The moat is regulatory and relational, not physical. AS9100D certification, a GSA Schedule position, and State Department registration are expensive, slow barriers that keep competitors out, and being a designed-in supplier on programs for Boeing, Lockheed, Raytheon, BAE, and Northrop makes requalification by a buyer painful and unlikely.
Defense test and sustainment is a durable tailwind. ATE, ATS, and TPS systems support fielded platforms for decades, so sustainment demand often outlives the original production run, and rising defense budgets plus reshoring of critical supply chains favor certified domestic shops.
For the right operator this is a platform, not a job. The existing certifications, prime relationships, and technical staff are the hard part to build, so a strategic buyer with capital and sales reach can add capacity and bid more programs against an already-approved vendor profile.

How to improve it

Map and quantify the backlog and program pipeline in the first 90 days, separating funded purchase orders from expected follow-on sustainment work. Knowing which programs are in production versus winding down tells you where to lean in and where revenue is at risk of aging out.
Formalize recurring sustainment and calibration revenue by converting one-off test equipment sales into service, spares, and recalibration agreements. Fielded ATE and TPS systems need ongoing support, and capturing that annuity raises both margin and buyer-exit multiple.
Broaden the customer concentration by pursuing additional primes and tier-one subcontractors where the AS9100D and GSA credentials already qualify the shop. Reliance on a handful of named primes is the single biggest valuation risk, and new logos directly de-risk the asset.
Invest in retention and documentation for the specialized technical workforce, since the seller's refusal of absentee buyers signals key-person exposure. Cross-train engineers, document test program development IP, and lock in critical staff with retention agreements before close.
Modernize quoting and capacity planning to shorten bid turnaround on new RFQs. Defense shops win incremental share by responding faster and more accurately, and a disciplined estimating process converts the existing approved-vendor status into more booked work.
Pursue adjacent certifications and clearances (facility security clearance, CMMC compliance, additional NATO cage codes) to expand the addressable program set. These credentials widen the moat and open classified or controlled work that commands premium pricing.

Diligence notes

Scrutinize customer and program concentration in detail, since revenue tied heavily to one or two primes or a single aging platform is a very different risk profile than a diversified book. Get revenue by customer and by program for at least three years, plus the funded status of each.
This is structured as a stock sale, which transfers all historical liabilities including prior government contract compliance, ITAR and export control exposure, and any DCAA or audit history. Have defense-contracts counsel review the State Department registration, GSA Schedule standing, and any past or pending compliance issues.
Validate the SDE build and the quality of the $1.2M, including how much depends on the owner's personal program relationships and technical role. Given the seller bars absentee buyers, confirm which revenue and relationships actually transfer versus walk out the door.
Verify the certifications and approvals are current and transferable through a change of control. AS9100D, GSA Schedule, and any prime supplier approvals can require re-audit or buyer notification, and a lapse during transition would gut the core moat.
Review the technical workforce in depth: tenure, clearances, key-person dependency, and whether documented processes exist for the ATE, ATS, and TPS development work. Specialized labor scarcity in this niche is a real constraint on both continuity and growth.
Assess working capital and contract cash flow timing, since defense manufacturing often carries long receivable cycles, milestone billing, and inventory tied up in long-lead parts. Confirm normalized working capital needs so the deal is not underpriced on day one.

Source

Originally listed on BizBuySell. View original listing →